Abstract
AbstractThis work presents a critical evaluation of the model factor for the mobilized strength design (MSD) method for cantilever deflection in undrained soft to medium-stiff clay. The model factor is characterized in two parts. A correction factor η is first defined as the ratio between the wall-top deflection computed from the FEM and its corresponding value computed from the MSD. The hardening soil with a small-strain model is used in FEM. The statistics of η are evaluated using 82 numerical simulations. Because η is not random, and therefore cannot be modeled directly as a random variable, it is decomposed as a product of a systematic part (f) and a random part (η∗). The random part is modeled as a lognormal random variable with a mean of 1.01 and a coefficient of variation (COV) of 0.18. The model factor for FEM (εFEM) is next defined as the ratio between the measured wall-top deflection and the corresponding FEM result. The statistics of εFEM are evaluated using 45 field cases. The ratio εFEM is random and can be modeled directly as a lognormal random variable with a mean of 1.01 and a COV of 0.21. The model factor for MSD (εMSD) is finally derived from the product of η and εFEM. This proposed approach is validated by 14 centrifuge tests. The importance of including the proposed model factor εMSD in reliability analysis is illustrated using a field example.