Abstract
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications after surgery. Opioid use is a significant risk factor. We utilised a crossover design to test this hypothesis in the same individuals that opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) compared with opioid-inclusive anaesthesia reduces PONV.
This randomised double-blind crossover trial included adult patients undergoing two surgical procedures for lower extremity wounds under general anaesthesia. Each patient received both OFA (i.v. lidocaine, esketamine, dexmedetomidine and propofol) and opioid-inclusive anaesthesia (sufentanil and propofol); which came first was determined by randomisation. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV during the first 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the severity of PONV, use of rescue antiemetics, postoperative pain, need for rescue analgesia, adverse events, time to extubation, and length of recovery room stay.
Sixty-six patients completed this study (mean age 53 years, 36% female). The median washout period was 9 days. Compared with opioid-inclusive anaesthesia, OFA reduced the incidence of PONV 0-48 h postoperatively (5% vs. 23%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55,
= 0.006), which remained significant in the prespecified adjusted analysis (OR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.32,
= 0.001). OFA also led to a reduced severity of PONV, a lower rate of hypotension, and a longer time to extubation. Postoperative pain and other outcomes were similar between the two anaesthetic techniques.
This crossover trial demonstrates that OFA reduced PONV following lower extremity wound surgery, providing compelling evidence for the administration of OFA to enhance perioperative care.
ChiCTR2200061511 (https://www.chictr.org.cn).